Legal Opinion

Burdick v. Burdick

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 5, 1928No. Docket No. 5047PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

A suit for divorce was instituted by the respondent herein, the appellant served and filed an answer and cross-complaint, and respondent answered the pleading last mentioned. The complaint alleged nonsupport and desertion, the existence of community property in Riverside County, and that $250 was a reasonable fee for an attorney whom the plaintiff was compelled to employ in order to present her action. She prayed judgment dissolving the bonds of matrimony, all of the realty constituting the community property, attorney’s fees in said amount, and temporary alimony and permanent maintenance,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Loveren v. LoverenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Reid v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Lacey v. LaceyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Sheppard v. SheppardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  5. Stampfli v. StampfliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ralphs v. RalphsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Nelson v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Double v. DoubleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API