Legal Opinion

Rader v. Thrasher

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 14, 1972No. Civ. 28345PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TAYLOR, P. J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff, Richard Rader, from a judgment granting the motion of defendants, Thrasher and Lange, for a summary judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c) in Rader’s action for defamamation on grounds of absolute privilege (Civ. Code, § 47, subd. 2). Rader contends that the motion should have been denied as: 1) the statements were not privileged as they were not reasonably related to the judicial proceedings; 2) there were triable issues of fact; and 3) the declaration of Lange was not in proper form to qualify as an affidavit.

The first cause of action of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Thornton v. RhodenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Gosewisch v. DoranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Rader v. ThrasherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Smith v. HatchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Pettitt v. LevyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Younger v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Rosenfeld, Meyer & Susman v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Leo F. Piazza Paving Co. v. Foundation Constructors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API