Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Clements

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 9, 1982No. Civ. 48201PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MILLER, J.

In this case we examine the discharge of a debt by the federal bankruptcy court when the bankrupt spouse was required to make payments on the discharged obligation as part of a property settlement agreement ordered by a state family law court. The precise question presented by this appeal is whether the court below erred in reducing the bankrupt spouse’s monthly support to reflect payments ultimately made on the discharged obligation by the nonbankrupt spouse who remained personally liable on the community debt. We conclude that no error was made.

William and Marlene Clements…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. In Re BurrusSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. De Sylva v. BallentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Ohio Ex Rel. Popovici v. AglerSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. In Re Marriage of LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Pfliger v. PfligerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Macy v. MacyWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Benavidez v. BenavidezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Brabham v. Brabham (In Re Brabham)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 1995
  5. Siragusa v. SiragusaNevada Supreme Court · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API