Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Maunder
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 22, 1976No. Civ. 14639PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT. *
Gwendolyn Maunder appeals an order denying her request for an increase in spousal support (Civ. Code, § 4801, subd. (a)).
In an interlocutory judgment of dissolution, Gwendolyn was awarded, among other things, child and spousal support and a community property interest in Donald’s retirement pay from the Navy. She is able to garnish his service pension to obtain unpaid child and spousal support, for federal law provides: “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, effective January 1, 1975, moneys (the entitlement to which is based upon remuneration for employment) due…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Leupe v. LeupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- In Re Marriage of MulhernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Dean v. DeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Darter v. MagnussenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Edwards v. EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Marriage of DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- In Re Marriage of FithianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- In Re the Marriage of Marion E.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- In Re Marriage of FarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- In Re Marriage of CampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983