Legal Opinion

State v. Minter

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 5, 1997No. 94112503; CA A92593PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

After a trial to the court, defendant was found guilty of burglary in the first degree. ORS 164.225. For purposes of sentencing, the court classified the conviction as a Crime Category 7 offense. The state appeals and assigns error to the classification, arguing that the court was required to classify the conviction in Crime Category 9 because the state charged and proved that defendant was armed with a deadly weapon when he committed the crime. OAR 253-04-002(2), App 3. We review a claim that a sentencing court erred in ranking the crime seriousness classification of the current crime as a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MoellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. MoellerOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. FerrellOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. CasavanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. O'QUINNCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API