State v. Ferrell
Oregon Supreme Court
(Cases Consolidated for Argument and Decision)
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
In State v. Moeller, 105 Or App 434, 806 P2d 130, rev dismissed, 312 Or 76, 815 P2d 701 (1991), the Court of Appeals held that the words “scheme or network” in OAR 253-04-002, App 4, are unconstitutionally vague, in violation of Article I, sections 20 and 21, of the Oregon Constitution. The correctness of that holding is not before us here. The effect of that holding was to affirm the trial court’s order setting aside the indictment in that case.
The only issue before this court in these 13 cases consolidated for review 2 is whether these defendants, each of whom was convicted after trial of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. WagnerOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. BootsOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. SteevesOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- State v. MoellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. GornickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- State v. BootsOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. WoodallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. WoodsonOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. ArellanoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.