Legal Opinion

Fry v. Woodward Et Ux

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1960PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

(Pro Tempore)

Plaintiffs Pry and Marthaller, who are the purchasers under contract from the record owners, ' brought this suit to quiet title against the defendants Woodward, who are husband and wife. Defendants assert they have title by adverse possession. The suit concerns a tract of land in Josephine County lying between the Applegate River and what is known as the Old Rogue River Loop Highway, which parallel each other. The property lies downstream a short distance below the location where the old Pacific Highway crossed the river, and is bounded on the West by the Loop Highway and on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reeves v. PortaOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Laurance v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Springer v. DURRETTE ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Knecht v. SPAKEOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Du Val v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gerner v. SullivanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  2. Scott v. ElliottOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Beaver v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Winthers v. BertrandOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Simpson v. Golden Resorts, LLLPSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API