Legal Opinion

Laurance v. Tucker

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1938PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

This is a suit to restrain the defendant from maintaining a drain over plaintiffs’ premises in Prairie City, Oregon, to carry away the overflow of a septic tank and the waste water and sewage from a house on premises adjoining those of the plaintiffs, upon which said premises one of the plaintiffs and the defendant reside respectively.

The complaint was filed on August 5, 1935,.and on November 29, 1935, the defendant filed a motion to make it more definite and certain. The motion was overruled and the defendant was allowed 25 days to answer. The decree appealed from was entered on March 21,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Falls City Lumber Co. v. WatkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Seely v. SebastianOregon Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Thornburg v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Feldman Et Ux. v. Knapp Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Reeves v. PortaOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Hoffman v. Freeman Land and Timber, LLC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Lee v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1978

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API