Legal Opinion

Springer v. DURRETTE ET UX

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1959PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

The plaintiff brought this suit to obtain a declaratory decree adjudicating the ownership of a parcel of land built up as an accretion to the upland by the action of the Willamette River. The defendants’ and plaintiff’s lands are contiguous, the defendants’ land being to the north of the plaintiff’s land. The Willamette River flows in a northerly direction on the west side of the two tracts. The accretion, which is in the form of a peninsula in the river, extends along the westerly sides of the plaintiff’s and defendants’ land. The peninsula has its base at the westerly boundary of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Webber v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Reeves v. PortaOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Linn County v. RozelleOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Rowland v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Lantry v. ParkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1893

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Peters v. Juneau-Douglas Girl Scout CouncilAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Norgard v. Busher Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Sproul v. GilbertOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Da Shores v. Dl LindseyWyoming Supreme Court · 1979

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API