Legal Opinion

Winthers v. Bertrand

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1964PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

In this suit for a decree declaring plaintiff to be the owner of certain real property and for an injunction requiring defendant to remove part of a building alleged to be encroaching upon plaintiff’s land, the defense was title by adverse possession. The trial court found title to be in plaintiff and decreed that the encroaching building be removed.

The only issue on the adverse possession question is, did the defendant and her husband, now deceased, possess for the ten-year period the property in dispute? ORS 12.050.

Plaintiff’s land is bounded on the west by that of the defendant. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clauder v. MorserOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Jensen v. ProbertOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Fry v. Woodward Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. McKee v. FieldsOregon Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bach v. SarichWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Ken Leahy Construction, Inc. v. Cascade General, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Bauman v. TurpenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. Bauman v. TurpenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. Beaver v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API