Legal Opinion

Scott v. Elliott

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1969PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

(Pro Tempore).

Plaintiff brought this suit to enjoin defendant from interfering with his peaceful enjoyment of a tract of land 1040.16 feet long and 33 feet wide, and to bar defendant from asserting any right or title to the property. The complaint contends that defendant placed large quantities of junk, odd machinery, poles and debris on the land, changed the bed of a watercourse which ran through the property, moved quantities of dirt from plaintiff’s land to that of defendant, and caused an electrical power line to be placed on the land so that it traversed the length of it. Plaintiff asks…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reeves v. PortaOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Laurance v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Irvine v. City of OelweinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  4. Black River Improvement Co. v. La Crosse Booming & Transportation Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Powell v. Superior Portland Cement, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Farmers Home Administration v. RedlandWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Faulconer v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. IslamOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Rise v. SteckelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Beaver v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API