Legal Opinion

Kirsch v. Kirsch

California Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1896No. 15702PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal^ from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco granting a writ of assistance in an action for divorce. James M. Troutt, Judge. ■The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Appeal from an order made November 2, 1893, granting respondent a writ of assistance to recover possession of certain real property.

Appellant and respondent had been wife and husband. Appellant sued her husband in divorce, claiming a piece of real property, title to which stood in her name as her separate property. The husband answered and cross-complained, charging his wife with adultery, and declaring the land in question to be the property of the community.

He was granted a divorce by judgment and decree entered March 18, 1887. It was also decreed that the property in question was community…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kershaw v. ThompsonNew York Court of Chancery · 1820
  2. City of Los Angeles v. MellusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Montgomery v. TuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Terry v. HammondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Hardenbergh v. BaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Johnston v. OtaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Emerick v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Westphal v. ArnouxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. Porter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Hohn v. PaulyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API