Kershaw v. Thompson
New York Court of Chancery
THE petition of Jacob Berry, one of the defendants, stated, that on the 10th of August last, he became a purchaser of the premises mentioned in the pleadings in this cause, which were sold under a decree of this Court. That on the 12th of August, the master executed a deed to him, for the consideration of eight thousand three hundred and fifty dollars, being the price at which the premises were struck off, and deemed to be their full value.
Read the full summary
THE petition of Jacob Berry, one of the defendants, stated, that on the 10th of August last, he became a purchaser of the premises mentioned in the pleadings in this cause, which were sold under a decree of this Court. That on the 12th of August, the master executed a deed to him, for the consideration of eight thousand three hundred and fifty dollars, being the price at which the premises were struck off, and deemed to be their full value. That within ten days after the conveyance, he applied to the defendant, Elizabeth Thompson, who was and is in possession of the premises, and requested a…
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellob.
This is an application, on the part „ . , „ , „ , ^ of the defendant Berry, as a purchaser of the mortgaged premises, for an order upon the defendant Elizabeth Thompson, to deliver up the possession. She is the wife of J. Thompson, the mortgagor, and united with him in the mortgage; and she was with her husband made a party to the bill, which was filed by the plaintiff as mortgagee, to foreclose *612the equity of redemption. She and her husband suffered the bill to be taken pro confesso. The bill stated thát she, as well as her husband, duly executed and acknowledged 1 mortgage ;…
2Cited by35 opinions
- Root v. WoolworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Riverdale Cotton Mills v. Alabama & Georgia Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Clark v. SeagravesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Ball v. Ridge Copper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Montgomery v. TuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.