Westphal v. Arnoux
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
BARDIN, J., pro tem.
This is an action wherein there is involved the question of the ownership of a parcel of land in Fresno County. The complaint, drawn in the usual pattern of an action in ejectment and for mesne profits, alleged ownership and right to possession in the plaintiff of the real property referred to. The defendant, by way of answer, controverted the plaintiff’s allegations of ownership and right of possession, and pleaded, in bar of recovery, the statute of limitations and also by cross-complaint asserted ownership in himself of said real property by reason of his adverse…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Feeney v. HinckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People ex rel. Attorney-General v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- McLeran v. BentonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Fox v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Granger v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lehmuth v. Long Beach Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- McKelvey v. RodriquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Wilkerson v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Commercial Bank & Trust Co. v. JordanMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- Smith v. LongIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.