City of Los Angeles v. Mellus
California Supreme Court
Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment in favor of the defendant Pio Pico, and from an order denying a new trial in the Seventeenth District Court of the County of Los Angeles. Sepulveda, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Morrison, C. J.:
On the seventh day of December, 1874, the defendant Mellus was elected Treasurer of the City of Los Angeles for the official term next thereafter ensuing, and on the twelfth day of December, 1874, he, as principal, and the other defendants as sureties, made, executed, and delivered to the plaintiff, as an official bond of the said Mellus, as such City Treasurer, their obligation in the sum of seventy-five thousand dollars, whereby the principal bound himself in the full sum of seventy-five thousand dollars, the defendant Temple in the sum of twenty-five thousand dollars, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cutter v. WhittemoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
- Terry v. HammondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Young v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
- Gerrish v. PrattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1861
- City of Los Angeles v. MellusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Newhall v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Cavanaugh v. CasselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Keidatz v. AlbanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Kirsch v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Harmon v. Comstock Horse & Cattle Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1890
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.