Hohn v. Pauly
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Plumas County, and from an order denying a new trial. J. E. Baker, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The plaintiff is a widow without children.
At one time she was the wife of one Andrew Hersom, and after his death she married John Hohn, who died in 1898. Upon the property in controversy she filed two declarations of homestead, the first dated and recorded May 13, 1899, and the second September 23, 1901. The second differs from the first only by reason of the additional recital “that I am now unmarried and have no children and that I am a person other than the head of a family, ’ ’ although the sufficiency of neither declaration is challenged. On December 30, 1901, a judgment in the superior…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- People v. MayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Clavey v. LordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Phelps v. RooneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
- Lubbock v. McMannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Rosenblum v. LevyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dean v. KuchelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Bullis v. StanifordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Curtin v. SalomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Security State Bank v. Clovis Mill & Elevator Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- Lacey v. BertoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.