Legal Opinion

Emerick v. Miller

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1902No. 19,341PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From Wabash Circuit Court; U. Z. Wiley, Special J udge. Proceeding for a writ of assistance by Harry L. Miller against Louisa Gr. Emerick. From a decree for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court, under §1837j Burns 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

— Appellee being the grantee of the purchaser at sheriff’s sale in a foreclosure proceeding, and being denied by the judgment defendant possession of a part of the premises purchased, upon notice and motion procured a redocketing of the foreclosure ease, and thereupon filed his petition for a writ of assistance. The undisputed facts .set forth in the petition are to the effect following: The foreclosure complaint was sufficient; appellant was the. sole mortgagor defendant, and was timely and duly, summoned to appear thereto; she did not appear, and a decree of foreclosure was duly entered…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Root v. WoolworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Aurora City v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Krekeler v. . RitterNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. Cavanaugh v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Stone v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Oster v. BroeIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Moore-Mansfield Construction Co. v. Marion, Bluffton & Eastern Traction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. TeWalt v. TeWaltIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Larue v. American Diesel Engine Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1911

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API