Legal Opinion

Wells v. Housing Authority of the City of Wilmington

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1938PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Tbe plaintiff contends that chapter 456 of tbe Public Laws of 1935, known as tbe Housing Authorities Act of 1935, is unconstitutional, since tbe purposes sought to be accomplished by tbe act are not of a public nature, that tbe body created under it has not been given any governmental function and is not a municipal corporation; that tbe city of Wilmington is without power to convey any of its property to this corporation, and that tbe property, in tbe bands of tbe corporation, if conveyed, would not be exempt from taxation.

These contentions are somewhat sketchily supported by argument and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Yarborough v. North Carolina Park CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Smith v. School Trustees.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Brockenbrough v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. Gunter v. Town of SanfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Housing Authority v. HigginbothamTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. The Housing Authority v. DockweilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Williamson v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  5. In Re Brewster Street Housing SiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API