Legal Opinion
Nickum v. City of Bainbridge Island
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 24, 2009No. 38217-2-IIPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*371¶1 George C. Nickum, Jr., Margaret D. Nickum, David M. Snedeker, and Bonnie Snedeker (collectively the Nickums) filed a Land Use Petition Act (LUPA)1 action on January 22,2008, challenging a city of Bainbridge Island (City) decision to allow Verizon Wireless LLC to “construct a wireless communication facility on a Puget Sound Energy pole” on a neighbor’s parcel. Before their LUPA action, the Nickums had filed an administrative appeal with a city hearing examiner in January 2008. The hearing examiner rejected their appeal on jurisdictional grounds because it was not filed within 14 days of the…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- South Hollywood Hills Citizens Ass'n v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Phillips v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Watch v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Housing Authority of City of Seattle v. BinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Nickum v. City of Bainbridge IslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Durland v. San Juan CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- West v. StahleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Bryce v. Lawrence (In re Bryce)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.