Legal Opinion
Millay v. Cam
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 21, 1998No. 65177-9PublishedCited by 121 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
955 P.2d 791 (1998)
135 Wash.2d 193
Jack M. MILLAY, Petitioner,
v.
Elena K. CAM and Raymond Blaisdell, Respondents.
No. 65177-9.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued January 27, 1998.
Decided May 21, 1998.
Case & Dusterhoff, James D. Case, R. Bruce Dusterhoff, Portland, for Petitioner.
Joseph Udall, Bradley Andersen, Skamania County Prosecutor, Stevenson, for Respondents.
SANDERS, Justice.
We are asked to clarify the procedures for statutory redemption of real property. Three issues are presented: (1) may a prospective redemptioner toll the statutory redemption period by filing a declaratory…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Miebach v. ColasurdoWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Addleman v. Board of Prison Terms and ParolesWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Douchette v. Bethel School District No. 403Washington Supreme Court · 1991
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by121 opinions
- State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. BreazealeWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. BreazealeWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Perez-Crisantos v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2017
- Enterprise Leasing, Inc. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1999
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.