Millay v. Cam
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSanders, J.
We are asked to clarify the procedures for statutory redemption of real property. Three issues are presented: (1) may a prospective redemptioner toll the statutory redemption period by filing a declaratory judgment action without paying the amount required to redeem, (2) does the filing of a declaratory judgment action substantially comply with the payment requirement in RCW 6.23.040(3) and 6.23.080(1), and (3) if a declaratory action will not substitute for payment, should we grant equitable relief when the redemptioner in possession submits a grossly exaggerated statement of the sum…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Miebach v. ColasurdoWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Addleman v. Board of Prison Terms and ParolesWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Douchette v. Bethel School District No. 403Washington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by135 opinions
- State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. BreazealeWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. BreazealeWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Perez-Crisantos v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2017
130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.