Legal Opinion
Nickum v. City of Bainbridge Island
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 8, 2009No. 38217-2-IIPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
223 P.3d 1172 (2009)
153 Wash.App. 366
George C. NICKUM, Jr. and Margaret D. Nickum, Husband and Wife, David M. Snedeker and Bonnie Snedeker, Husband and Wife, Appellants,
v.
CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND, a Washington Municipal Corporation, Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Seattle SMSA Limited Partnership, a Delaware Limited Partnership, Jeffry E. Powers and Deborah Haase, Husband and Wife, and Puget Sound Energy, Inc., a Washington Corporation, Respondents.
No. 38217-2-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
November 24, 2009.
As Amended December 8, 2009.
George…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- South Hollywood Hills Citizens Ass'n v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Phillips v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Watch v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Housing Authority of City of Seattle v. BinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Durland v. San Juan CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- West v. StahleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Bryce v. Lawrence (In re Bryce)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 2013
- Julian v. City of VancouverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.