State v. Bomar
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ACKERMAN, Judge.
¶ 1 The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying Anthony Gary Bomar’s request for pre-sentence incarceration credit under Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 13-709(B) (1989). Because we conclude that the presentence incarceration credit provisions of A.R.S. section 13-709(B) do not apply to commitment orders, we find no error and affirm the sentence.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 Bomar was charged with one count of aggravated assault, a class 3 dangerous felony, pursuant to A.R.S. section 13-1204(A)(2) (Supp.1996), for a crime alleged to have…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- State v. KorzepArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. RiggsArizona Supreme Court · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re John M.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- State v. McMahonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- State v. UrquidezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- State v. RandlesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Robinson v. HothamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.