Legal Opinion

State v. Bomar

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 22, 2001No. 1 CA-CR 99-0792PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ACKERMAN, Judge.

¶ 1 The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying Anthony Gary Bomar’s request for pre-sentence incarceration credit under Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 13-709(B) (1989). Because we conclude that the presentence incarceration credit provisions of A.R.S. section 13-709(B) do not apply to commitment orders, we find no error and affirm the sentence.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 Bomar was charged with one count of aggravated assault, a class 3 dangerous felony, pursuant to A.R.S. section 13-1204(A)(2) (Supp.1996), for a crime alleged to have…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. State v. KorzepArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. RiggsArizona Supreme Court · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re John M.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  2. State v. McMahonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. State v. UrquidezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  4. State v. RandlesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  5. Robinson v. HothamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API