Legal Opinion
State v. McMahon
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 22, 2002No. 1 CA-CR 01-0333PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PATTERSON, Judge.
¶ 1 The sole issue raised in this appeal is whether the portion of Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 28-708(A) (2000) prohibiting an “exhibition of speed or acceleration” on a public street or highway is unconstitutionally vague. We conclude that it is not and affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 Timothy N. McMahon (“defendant”) was cited for “exhibition of speed” in violation of A.R.S. § 28-708(A) after Maricopa County Sheriffs deputies observed a vehicle driven by defendant squeal its tires and fishtail into the median lane as it turned right from a stop…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. McDermottCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- State v. ZINSMEYERCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- State v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- State v. PoshkaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- State v. CoulterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.