Legal Opinion

State v. Urquidez

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 31, 2006No. 2 CA-CR 2004-0419PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ECKERSTROM, Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant Guillermo Urquidez was convicted after a jury trial of one count of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and one count of possession of a deadly weapon as a prohibited possessor. He was sentenced to the substantially aggravated term of twenty-five years for the aggravated assault and to a consecutive, presumptive term of ten years for the prohibited possession. Urqui-dez argues that his indictment was duplicitous and that the trial court inadequately instructed the jury during the aggravation phase of his trial and erroneously imposed consecutive…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. AndersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. MartinezArizona Supreme Court · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. State of Arizona v. Victor Kyle LizardiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. State v. CottenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  4. State v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. State v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API