Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Hotham

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 6, 2005No. 1 CA-SA 05-0190PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TIMMER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Does an indigent criminal defendant possess federal and state constitutional *167rights to choose non-publicly funded private counsel to represent his interests in defending criminal charges? In resolving this special action brought by Atonal Jacoby Robinson we answer that question affirmatively and hold that indigent defendants have constitutional rights to make this choice.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 The State charged Robinson with two counts of child abuse and one count of second-degree murder. At Robinson’s initial appearance hearing held on January 7, 2005, the court…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Edward P. Bolding v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  2. State of Arizona v. Derek Jesus RamosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  3. State v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  4. State v. HaslockCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  5. State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API