Legal Opinion

Bond Electric Co. v. Mill City Plastics, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 8, 1960No. 37,883PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment of the district court.

The facts accepted by both parties to the appeal are as follows: *545The appellant, Bond Electric Company, successor to Tieso & Kostka Electric Company, engaged in the business of electric contracting and repair work, furnished material and labor at the building on the premises known as 2845 Harriet Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota, at the special instance and request of Mill City Plastics, Inc., one of the defendants in the mechanics lien action. The labor and material consisted in a general way of repairing an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Berglund & Peterson v. AbramSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  2. Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Couture v. HennessySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Master Asphalt Co. v. Voss Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API