Legal Opinion
Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. Orondo Mines
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 27, 1939No. Civ. 2447PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
This action was instituted by respondent to enforce a lien for materials furnished on a group of mining claims in Inyo County. Respondent obtained judgment and the appellant owners have appealed.
On March 7, 1933, the defendants and appellants Alice H. McIntosh and H. K. Pollock, as owners and lessors, entered into an agreement with Horace H. Howard, as lessee, granting him a lease (with an option to buy) on certain mining claims situated in Inyo County. This lease was subsequently assigned to Gold Blossom Mining Co., which later changed its corporate name to Blue Bonnet Mining Co., and that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Santa Monica Lumber & Mill Co. v. HegeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Hines v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Evans v. JudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- S. H. Harmon Lumber Co. v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1984
- Dowden v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Arthur B. Siri, Inc. v. BridgesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Kim v. JF ENTERPRISESCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.