Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Bagshaw

California Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1908No. S.F. No. 1416PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPLICATION for a discharge on Writ of Habeas Corpus, directed to the Sheriff of Marin County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

Petitioner seeks to be discharged from the custody of the sheriff of the county of Marin, by whom he is held under a commitment issued by the justice’s court of Sausalito township of said county, based upon a judgment given in said court upon a conviction therein of the crime of carrying on the business of selling liquor in the town of Mill Valley, a municipal corporation of the sixth class in said county, without taking out or procuring the license prescribed therefor by an ordinance of said town.

The principal contention of petitioner is that said justice’s court was without jurisdiction to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex parte ChristensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Ex parte MansfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Ex parte StephenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. In re LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Ex Parte SweetmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Teachout v. BogyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. In Re JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. In Re GrovesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. People v. KatrinakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. People v. BeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API