Legal Opinion

In Re Groves

California Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1960No. Crim. 6598PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

By petition for a writ of habeas corpus petitioner challenges his conviction of engaging in business in the city of Palm Springs without a license as required by the Palm Springs Ordinance Code. We issued an order to show cause directed to the Chief of Police of Palm Springs and ordered petitioner released on his own recognizance.

Petitioner secured a state license to operate a “milk products plant” in Palm Springs for the manufacture and sale at retail of ice cream products. (Agr. Code, §§ 660-661.) He contends that the state statutes establish a complete system for the licensing and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ainsworth v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. In Re Application of GalushaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. In Re JinglesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Agnew v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Country of Plumas v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Rivera v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. City of Sausalito v. County of MarinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Weekes v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Bravo Vending v. City of Rancho MirageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Midway Orchards v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API