Ex parte Mansfield
California Supreme Court
Hearing in the Supreme Court upon a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Petitioner was convicted in Butte county under a complaint charging him with carrying on the business of selling distilled, fermented, malt, vinous,and other spirituous liquors, without having first procured a license so to do, contrary to the provisions of ordinance No. 124, Butte county ordinances, entitled “ An ordinance to regulate the business of selling liquors in Butte county, California, to provide for licensing the same, and for the revocation of such licenses in certain cases, and prescribing penalties for the violation thereof.” The ordinance is pleaded in full in the complaint.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- In re SicCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Ex parte ChristensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Ex Parte RoachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Ex parte HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Country of Plumas v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- In Re MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Cuzner v. the California ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- People v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.