Legal Opinion

Fullen v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1979No. 13919-PRPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Chief Justice.

This is a petition for review of a memorandum decision of the Court of Appeals, Division One, which affirmed the Commission’s holding that a petition to reopen was not filed in time to cover an industrially related operation on petitioner’s knee. We take jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 47(b), Rules of the Supreme Court, 17A A.R.S.

We must answer the following questions on appeal:

1. Was the letter to the Industrial Commission of 2 January 1975 seeking to reopen ineffective because it was not signed by the petitioner?

2. Did the statement of the physician have to be attached…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allen v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Jones v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  3. Lugar v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  4. Engle v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Adams v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Salt River Project v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Arizona Department of Public Safety v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  4. County of Maricopa v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. Greenway Baptist Church v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API