Legal Opinion

Benafield v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 31, 1998No. 2 CA-IC 97-0015PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PELANDER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 In this statutory special action, petitioner Caryl Benafield challenges the Industrial Commission (the Commission) award finding her industrial injury medically stationary without permanent disability. We set aside the award because the ALJ erroneously precluded petitioner’s treating physician from testifying, based on a misinterpretation of Tsosie v. Industrial Commission, 183 Ariz. 539, 905 P.2d 548 (App.1995).

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 We review the procedural history of this case in some detail because of its relevance to the issues raised. We view the facts in the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Smith v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Adams v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Cavco Industries v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Carousel Snack Bar v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Ford v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Meiners v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  2. Douglas Auto & Equipment v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  3. Meiners v. University of Arizona , State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API