Legal Opinion

Madrid v. St. Joseph Hospital

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1996No. 23226PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BACA, Chief Justice.

Appellants challenge the constitutionality of the New Mexico Workers’ Compensation Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 52-1-1 to -70 (Repl.Pamp.1991 & Cum.Supp.1995) (“the Act”), under which each was denied the level of permanent partial disability benefits (PPD) she sought. 1 Each Appellant raises similar constitutional challenges to the Act. The Workers’ Compensation Administration has no authority to determine the constitutionality of the Act, Montez v. J & B Radiator, Inc., 108 N.M. 752, 754, 779 P.2d 129, 131 (Ct.App.), cert. denied, 108 N.M. 771, 779 P.2d 549 (1989); thus,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Tallman v. ABF (Arkansas Best Freight)New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Board of Trustees of the Employees' Retirement System v. Mayor of Baltimore CityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  4. Espanola Housing Authority v. AtencioNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Medina v. Zia CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Protz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Taylor v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Breen v. Carlsbad Municipal SchoolsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State Ex Rel. Coll v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Kitchell v. Public Service Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API