Legal Opinion

Kroeplin v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1987No. Civ. 870078PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESCHKE, Justice.

The North Dakota Workmen’s Compensation Bureau denied a claim by Cora A.

Kroeplin for permanent partial impairment of her right knee because it was not substantiated by the American Medical Association’s Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (2nd edition, 1984) (“AMA Guides”). On appeal the district court affirmed. On further review, we reverse and remand.

The Bureau adopted Directive 51C:

“In order to establish more certainty and uniformity in the award of permanent impairment benefits pursuant to North Dakota Century Code Sections 65-05-12, 65-05-13, and 65-05-14,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Hammond v. North Dakota State Personnel BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Boettner v. Twin City Construction CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Gregory v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Buechler v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Beckler v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Tooley v. AlmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Hayden v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Hayes v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Loberg v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API