Legal Opinion

Tsirlis v. Standard Oil Co. of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 1, 1939No. Civ. 10913PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiff sought damages for personal injuries sustained when a Ford automobile of the defendant company collided with the automobile of plaintiff. Upon a trial by jury, plaintiff had judgment and from said judgment, defendant appeals.

The accident occurred at about 5 o’clock on the morning of August 1, 1937, on the main highway between Sausalito and Richardson’s Bay bridge. Plaintiff was driving in a general northerly direction and defendant’s automobile was being driven in a general southerly direction on said highway. It appears unnecessary to set forth all the facts concerning the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Engstrom v. Auburn Automobile Sales Corp.California Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Swinnerton v. Argonaut Land & Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Bushnell v. Yoshika TashiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Barton v. McDermottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Smith v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Garland v. HirshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Hennelly v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Gardner v. MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Montgomery v. HutchinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API