Legal Opinion
Smith v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 6, 1935PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.
The plaintiffs in these two cases are husband and wife. The suits arose out of an automobile collision which occurred on Ocean Avenue near the intersection of Dawson Avenue in West Haven, on August 25th, 1932, at about 9.15 p.m. daylight saving time. Lena Smith sued for personal injuries claimed to have resulted from the collision; and her husband for damage to his automobile, claimed to have been completely demolished, and expenses incurred by reason of his wife’s injuries. The plaintiffs claim that George W. Smith, accompanied by his wife, was operating his automobile in an easterly…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Perry v. HaritosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Middletown Trust Co. v. BregmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Matulis v. GansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- State v. JourneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Voegeli v. Waterbury Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Crawford v. NilanNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- State v. PerelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- State v. McDowellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Gaul v. NoivaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Tsirlis v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.