Legal Opinion
Garland v. Hirsh
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 27, 1946No. Civ. 15098PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtYork, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment on the verdict of the jury in favor of defendant Hirsh, arising out of an action for the recovery of damages to property of plaintiff Garland and for personal injuries sustained by plaintiffs Iola Woods and Rose Ritter in a collision between the automobiles of said defendant Hirsh and the plaintiff Garland. Plaintiff Merle Ritter joined in the action because as the husband of Rose Ritter he was personally liable for her hospital and medical bills incurred as result of her injuries.
The appeal is presented upon a settled statement from which it appears that the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Barsha v. Metro-Goldwyn-MayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Market Street Railway Co. v. GeorgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Hinkle v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Bushnell v. Yoshika TashiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Davy v. Public National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Church of the Merciful Saviour v. Volunteers of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Cottle v. GibbonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- County of Riverside v. Loma Linda UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Dimond v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.