Legal Opinion
Fuller v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 30, 2001No. AC 20722PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
The petitioner, Keith Fuller, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He claims on appeal that the habeas court improperly failed to find that (1) his trial counsel was ineffective because counsel failed to advise him of his right to sentence review and (2) his appellate counsel was ineffective because counsel failed to file for certification to appeal to the Supreme Court. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
The factual background of this case is set forth in State v. Fuller, 48 Conn. App. 374, 709 A.2d 1142…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Phillips v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. AECO Elevator Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. RiosConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Holley v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. GasserConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Crump v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Lewis v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- JANULAWICZ v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011