Legal Opinion

JANULAWICZ v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 29, 2011No. AC 31760PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BISHOP, J.

The respondent, the commissioner of correction, appeals following the habeas court’s denial of his petition for certification to appeal from its judgment granting the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by the petitioner, Richard Janulawicz. The respondent claims that the habeas court abused its discretion in denying the petition for certification to appeal and that the court improperly granted the petition for a writ of habeas corpus on the basis that the petitioner’s appellate counsel failed to seek certification for review by the Supreme Court. We agree and reverse…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Simms v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. Iovieno v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  5. James L. v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. JANULAWICZ v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API