Legal Opinion
Crump v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 19, 2002No. AC 21800PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
The petitioner, Jacob Cramp, appeals from the habeas court’s dismissal of his third amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, he claims that the court improperly failed to find that (1) his trial counsel was ineffective, (2) his appellate counsel was ineffective and (3) he was innocent. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our disposition of this appeal. The petitioner was charged with the crimes of murder, attempt to commit murder, assault in the second degree, carrying a pistol without a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bunkley v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Miller v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. GrullonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. SanchezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. AsberryConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Rivera v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Beverly v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Holloway v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.