Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Siegel v. Roche Diagnostics, Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 30, 2013No. 11-cv-5378 (ADS)(AKT)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
ARTHUR D. SPATT, District Judge.
On November 2, 2011, the Relator Alan Siegel (the “Relator” or the “Plaintiff’), a former sales executive for the Defendant Roche Diagnostics Corporation (“Roche Diagnostics”), filed this qui tarn action against Roche Diagnostics and its alleged alter ego, Roche Holding AG. (“Roche Holding”), pursuant to the Federal False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 (the “FCA”).
On November 8, 2013, Roche Diagnostics, but not Roche Holding, moved to dismiss the complaint. Roche Holding has not yet appeared in this action. However, the Plaintiff…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Rockwell International Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Boykin v. KeyCorpCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,266 Irene L. Wright, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Ernst & Young LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States ex rel. Kester v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Zirogiannis v. Seterus, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- M.T. v. City of N.Y.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- United States ex rel. Coyne v. Amgen, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- United States ex rel. Osmose, Inc. v. Chemical Specialties, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.