Legal Opinion

Monnett v. Turpie

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1892No. 16,007PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Carroll Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

The action of the court, in refusing to grant the appellant a trial by jury, is the only question involved in this appeal.

The complaint consisted of three paragraphs. The first paragraph shows that on and prior to January 5, 1881, Thomas Monnett was the owner of several distinct tracts of land in Carroll and "White counties, Indiana, and in Prairie county, in the State of Arkansas; that he was, and, for a long time prior thereto, had been a person of unsound mind, of which the defendants had notice; that, on that day; with, full knowledge that he was of unsound mind, the defendants, James II.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Quarl v. AbbettIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Bethell v. BethellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Martin v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. First National Bank v. RootIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Towns v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Flint & Walling Manufacturing Co. v. BeckettIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Muncie & Portland Traction Co. v. Citizens Gas & Oil Mining Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. SimpsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Gwinn v. HobbsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. De BoltIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API