Legal Opinion

Towns v. Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1888No. 13,161PublishedCited by 38 opinions

From the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, C. J.

This suit was brought by Elizabeth Smith, her husband joining, to recover a personal judgment against William R. and Hiram Towns, on a promissory note, executed by the defendants, as joint makers, payable to the plaintiff. Elizabeth Towns was made a party defendant to answer concerning an alleged voluntary and fraudulent con*481veyanee of real estate made to her by her husband, Hiram Towns, with the intent to defraud the creditors of the latter. Prayer for a judgment against William R. and Hiram Towns, ■and for a decree setting aside the conveyance to Mrs. Towns, and that the property be…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Quarl v. AbbettIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Bruker v. KelseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Baker v. State ex rel. MillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Adams v. SlateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Curme, Dunn & Co. v. RauhIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Hiatt v. YerginIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Terpstra v. Farmers and Merchants BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Monnett v. TurpieIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Field v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Songer v. Civitas BankIndiana Supreme Court · 2002

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API