Legal Opinion

Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. De Bolt

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1894No. 1,218PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtLotz, C. J.

The appellee brought this action to recover the value of a horse killed by the locomotive and cars of the appellant. The cause was put at issue and tried by a jury, which returned a general verdict for appellee, on which judgment was rendered.

The assignments of error are that the trial court erred in overruling the separate demurrer to the first and second paragraphs of complaint, and in overruling the motion for a new trial. •

It appears, from the allegations of each paragraph, that the horse entered upon the track at a point where the same was not securely fenced. The failure to securely…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brunker v. CumminsIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Markover v. KraussIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. HaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. ModesittIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Batman v. SnoddyIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Oolitic Stone Co. v. RidgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Weinberg v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LammIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Callaway v. MellettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Flowers v. PoormanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API