Legal Opinion

Martin v. Martin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1889No. 11,912PublishedCited by 41 opinions

From the "Wabash Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBerkshire, J.

The complaint, as originally filed, 6on-tained but one paragraph, but afterwards second, third and fourth paragraphs were filed.. To each paragraph a demurrer was filed by the appellees John T. and Matilda Kendall. The court sustained the demurrers to the first, third and fourth paragraphs, and overruled the demurrer to the second paragraph, and proper exceptions were reserved. After-wards an amended third paragraph and two additional paragraphs of complaint, numbered five and six, were filed. To these .paragraphs the appellees Kendall demurred, and the court overruled the demurrers. An…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Potter v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Spencer v. RobbinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Caress v. FosterIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Scherer v. IngermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Gaff v. GreerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Mathews v. SniggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Monnett v. TurpieIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Levinson v. Citizens National Bank of EvansvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Songer v. Civitas BankIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Puterbaugh v. PuterbaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API