Legal Opinion
Kenney v. Healey Ford-Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 18, 1999No. AC 17800PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DALY, J.
The plaintiffs, Dennis Kenney, Muriel Jordan and Jay Jacobs, appeal from the trial court’s judgment following a trial to the court. The plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly failed to find that the defendants (1) violated the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq., (2) breached the implied warranty of merchantability included with every contract for the sale of goods and (3) were hable to them for fraudulent nondisclosure. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are necessary to our resolution of this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Normand Josef Enterprises, Inc. v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Web Press Services Corp. v. New London Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Duksa v. City of MiddletownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Web Press Services Corp. v. New London Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In re Carrier IQ, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Ancona v. Manafort Bros.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Richards v. Direct Energy Servs., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Miller v. GuimaraesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Johnson Electric Co. v. Salce Contracting Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.