Legal Opinion
Coakley v. Jaffe
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 1, 1999No. 98 Civ. 2473 JSRPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
RAKOFF, District Judge.
On July 1, 1999, Michael Jaffe and Daniel I. Neveloff, the remaining defendants in this case, moved for summary judgment on plaintiffs’ remaining claims, to wit, plaintiffs’ claim against both defendants for false arrest under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”), plaintiffs’ state law claim against both defendants for abuse of process, and plaintiffs’ state law claim against defendant Jaffe for breach of contract. 1 In addition, defendant Jaffe moved for sanctions against plaintiffs and plaintiffs’ counsel under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Wyatt v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Broughton v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Mark Cook v. Roberta Sheldon and Nelson Saldana, New York State TroopersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Little v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Bertuglia v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Ho Myung Moolsan Co. v. Manitou Mineral Water, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Catcove Corp. v. Patrick HeaneyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Williams v. YoungDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.