Legal Opinion

Wyatt v. Cole

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 18, 1992No. 91-126PublishedCited by 913 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

In Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co., 467 U. S. 922 (1982), we left open the question whether private defendants charged with 42 U. S. C. § 1988 liability for invoking state replevin, garnishment, and attachment statutes later declared unconstitutional are entitled to qualified immunity from suit. 457 U. S., at 942, n. 23. We now hold that they are not.

I

This dispute arises out of a soured cattle partnership. In July 1986, respondent Bill Cole sought to dissolve his partnership with petitioner Howard Wyatt. When no agreement could be reached, Cole, with the assistance of an *160attorney, respondent John…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by913 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Ziglar v. AbbasiSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  3. Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Kach v. Hose ex rel. St. Moritz Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  5. W. Michael Kimes J. Colette Boykin v. Peter G. Stone, Judge, Superior Court Robert L. Mezzetti, II Henry Mariani Robert MacHadoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

908 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API