Legal Opinion

Zeitlin v. Arnebergh

California Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1963No. L. A. 26905PublishedCited by 134 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

In this ease “Tropic of Cancer” by Henry Miller makes another one of its many court appearances. Its record to date has been a varied one; in some places the book is “obscene” and in others it is not; presently its legal status is largely tied into the geography of its sale or publication. In any event, our first task must be to deter mine whether the instant form of action, that of declaratory relief requested by a bookseller and would-be reader, properly presents the issue of the book’s proscription under Penal Code section 311. We hold this form of relief appropriate. Our second question…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Blackburn v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by134 opinions

  1. Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. A Book Named "John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure" v. Attorney General of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. In Re CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. In Re GianniniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. United States v. Irving Klaw and Jack KramerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965

129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API